Stuyvesant New York passenger train station

Stuyvesant New York passenger train station
as it looks now, please restore service

Sunday, June 13, 2010

History of Stuyvesant Landing, the site of Historic Train Station


History of Stuyvesant Landing



The town of Stuyvesant is located in the northwest corner of Columbia County bounded by Rensselaer County on the North; the town of Kinderhook on the east; the town of Stockport on the south; and the Hudson River on the west. It was a part of Albany County until Columbia County was formed in 1786. Stuyvesant Landing, then known as Kinderhook Landing was part of the town of Kinderhook until April 21, 1823, when it became a town in its own right and was name Stuyvesant.

That Henry Hudson sailed up the River which bears his name in 1609 is a well established fact. He put ashore at Stuyvesant Landing on September 18th of that year, where he was greeted by friendly Indians with many children. The area became known as Kinderhook meaning "children's corner". This area was called Kinderhook even before any settlement was established there, as it appeared on Block's map made in 1614. The Indians in this area were Mahikans.

A map made in 1630 by Belroeck door I Vingboons shows both Nutinhoeck and Kinderhoeck on the River. In 1638 New Netherlands was opened to free immigration and unrestricted trade. In about 1640 permanent settlers began to appear in this area.

Major Abraham Staats, who had place on Stockpot Creek, sent 4,200 beaver skins to Amsterdam in 1657.

One of the first recorded land transactions was later known as the Powell patent. Permission was given in July 1664 by the Commissaries at Fort Orange (Albany) and confirmed by Gov. Stuyvesant for several people to purchase land. The Dutch surrendered to the English in September but the new governor confirmed the grant unto Thomas Poule (Powell), Headrick Abells and others to a certain parcel of land lying and being betwixt the Nutted and Kinder Hoeck near fort Albany. This grant was given March 29, 1665. This land included the present day village of Stuyvesant and extended to the Kinderhook Creek. Nutted Hoeck is easy to place as the present day Newton Hook. Kinder Hoeck spoken of at this time was a Hoeck on the river presently known as Stuyvesant Landing.

Franks Peiteers Clover's Saw Kill is a little stream two miles north of Stuyvesant Landing and contained a mill as early as 1665 and must have been one of the first, if not the first mill, in the country. The stream has been known by various names from Pittannoock, the Indian name to Frans Peters Clover's Saw Kill, to Light House Creek and finally Mill Creek.

The early history of the town would not be complete without mentioning the visit by two Labadist Brethren while looking for a place to settle with some of their religious sect. The importance of this event is that they left a written record of their visit to the Hudson River area in 1679. Their record tells of anchoring at Kinderhook Landing to take on some grain that a female trader wanted carried down the river. While loading was being done, the two brethren walked up a creek and visited a waterfalls where a man had a saw mill. Kinderhook at this time was an area along th Hudson River currently known as Stuyvesant Landing not the present day village of Kinderhook.

Semi-weekly post riders were established along the river as early as 1684. Most of the travel from New York to Albany was on the river.

Fur trade declined and in its place agriculture predominated. Great Britain restricted the colonies from manufacturing goods. They were to supply the mother county with raw materials and buy the finished products from Great Britain. Trade between Great Britain the West Indies and this area made the landowners prosperous. Overseas ships sailed up as far as Albany. By 1749, there were 47 sloops on the river. Stuyvesant had its share of sloop owners. Roads were crude and not much improved until after the Revolution. Post riders carried mail up and down the river shore until 1786, when the mail stage was established on the Old Post Road on the east side of the Hudson.

One of the first mills in the area was the saw mill already mentioned, run by Frans Pelters Clover. At Stuyvesant Falls there were grist and saw mills, with not much firm data as to the date but definitely in the 18th century as indicated on the map of 1743 to 1749 of the survey of Van Alen. A French map made by Bellin in 1744 labels the area "Moulin des Essars" meaning a mill built upon cleared ground. Other early mills were plaster mills, distilleries and foundries.

Brick making was established in the 18th Century using the fine clay deposits in the area.

The first census of Kinderhook in 1714 (and it is hard to know how much area this covered but it did include Stuyvesant Landing) showed a population of 193. By 1790 the census showed the town of Kinderhook at 4461.

When the town of Stuyvesant was formed, the name of Kinderhook Landing was changed to Stuyvesant Landing and Glencadia became Stuyvesant Falls. Medad Butler, a leader in the Landing and father of Benjamin F. Butler, had procured the essential authority to have the name changed in honor of Peter Stuyvesant.

During the French and Indian War and also the Revolution the town escaped serious trouble. It had a few people who were loyalist but the majority were patriots, some of whom fought for the cause of freedom. The area was noted for the wheat it produced and shipped during the revolution.

A post office was established at Kinderhook Landing in 1816 by the Federal Government. In 1826 there were two post offices; one brought mail three times a week by land rider the other had mail every day by steamboat.

This area along the Hudson was a haven for escaped slaves making their way North.

It is believed that Kinderhook Landing was used as a way station on the underground railroad.


The above text is used by permission of the Town of Stuyvesant, New York and was taken from "A Brief History of the Town of Stuyvesant" by Priscilla B. Frisbee, Town Historian, copyright 1976, all rights reserved, and published by the Town of Stuyvesant Bi-Centennial Committee. This publication is available at the Town of Stuyvesant Town Hall, Sunset Drive, Stuyvesant, NY 12173 (518) 758-6248.

Stuyvesant Landing hosts a new farmer's market at the Historic Stuyvesant Railroad Station

Stuyvesant Farmer's Market on the River

Now through the end of summer, Friday evenings, 4:00 p.m. to dusk
Stuyvesant Farmer's Market Combines Friday Evening River Gazing with Local Farmers/Artisans

Beginning on Friday, June 16, Stuyvesant Landing hosts a new farmer's market at the Historic Stuyvesant Railroad Station. The market will be held on Friday evenings throughout the summer from 4 p.m. until dusk. Several local providers have already signed up and shoppers will be able to "set their tables" from available produce, local dairy products, homemade baked goods and other local products. The market will also have plants in flats and baskets and other specialty items like goat's milk soaps.

"We are welcoming any local producer," says Marilyn Burch, who has organized this new venue. "There is no booth charge or mark-up and we have customers waiting at the door. We've talked it up quite a bit and we expect that there'll be a good crowd to start and a bigger crowd as people hear about it. People are very enthusiastic about this market from what we've been hearing."

Across the street from the market, the Riverview Café will be serving their usual Friday night dinners. Those unfamiliar with Riverview Café's Friday night dinners will definitely want to make a full evening of it.

The Stuyvesant Railroad Station Restoration Committee came up with the idea for a Farmer's Market discussing ways to use the train station. "One day, our train station will be fully back to life," says committee chair, Ken Hummel. "Until then we want to find interesting ways to use the station and let people know we have this historic treasure."

More history of the Stuyvesant Station and reasons to bring Amtrak

S T U Y V E S A N T
Create a stop for Amtrak at the Stuyvesant Train Station

BY THE SHORE of the Hudson is a village called Stuyvesant Landing.  We are now about 20 miles south of the state capital at Albany.  The river is considerably narrower here than it was back in Beacon, and all that lies between Riverview Street and the water is the old New York Central mainline from New York to Chicago.

BESIDE THE TRACKS stands the old New York Central Railroad Station.  Built around 1880, this was one of a family of similar stations that included an identical one in Staatsburg, NY (which was demolished in 1911 to make way for a new station now gone), one in Cold Spring, and two slightly larger still active ones in Peekskill and in Hudson.  In the mid-1950s, as the railroad began looking for ways to save money, the station at Stuyvesant Falls was closed.  It has remained abandoned ever since.

TODAY the old railroad station at Stuyvesant Landing has become one of those rare ruins that survive long enough to have lost all of its windows to caulk deterioration.  A stenciled note marks the date of the station's last paint-job:  September, 1946.  I paid my visit some 53 years later, at the beginning of January, 1999.  It was a bitterly cold day, made all the colder by a strong wind coming off the river.

AFTER TAKING a few photos, I went across the street to grab some lunch at George's Deli.  He was out of Roast Beef, so I had a Turkey sandwich instead.  Above the door was a restoration of the old station beneath which the words "Historic Symbol of Progress to Serve Again" were painted.  "That the station?" I asked the proprietor, who that day sported a violet baseball cap with the word "STUYVESANT" sewn across the front.

"YUP," he answered with a sigh.  He went-on to tell a story leading from years of neglect to acquisition by the town of Stuyvesant to recent efforts taken to shore the place up.  "I'd love to open a restaurant in there," he said, but when asked if he thought it would ever happen, his answer was a shruggish "nope."

I FINISHED my sandwich, (which by the way was excellent), bid farewell, and went out just in time to get a shot of a southbound Amtrak train, streaking headlong past the station at something around 80 miles per hour. In an hour and a half it will be in New York.  Is this little building doomed?  Time will tell.  It's been abandoned now for nearly fifty years.  We should know soon.  Good luck, Stuyvesant Station.

UPDATE:  Since 1998, extensive stabilization work has been carried out on the station, sealing it from the elements. Though much remains to be done, this work has ensured the building's survival for some time to come.  The building has also been listed on the National Register of Historic Places.



Links | Home | HVR | E-mail

© T.E. Rinaldi, 2006

Letter to Senator Gillebrand on restoring service on Amtrak Line

Dear Senator Gillebrand,

http://stuyvesantstation.blogspot.com/

The above link is for  the blog of The Committee to Restore Passenger Train Service to Historic Stuyvesant Station.

Stuyvesant Train Station in Northern Columbia County, NY is exactly half way between the Albany Amtrak station and the Hudson Amtrak station.

The Hudson Amtrak station on Fridays and Sundays is over capacity, with all of the weekenders who use it.  Half of those weekenders commute, ie drive, from Northern Columbia county.

We would like bring Amtrak service, even if limited, back to this Historic Stuyvesant Station.
When amtrak was created, Amtrak ridership studies did not support a stop at this station, this was over 40 years ago.

Northern Columbia County now has many weekend homes, and homes of people who commute to NYC on a daily basis for work.

Passenger service at The Stuyvesant station would save residents of northern Columbia County a very long drive to get to the Hudson or Albany train stations, when commuting to New York or Albany or Picking up the many weekend Visitors & guests who now come to Columbia county.

I know there is talk about speeding up the trains on the Amtrak Empire Line, but what would provide even better service to the residents of New York and the Hudson Valley would be to add one more stop at Stuyvesant.

An Amtrak stop at Stuyvesant Station would create more jobs in Columbia County and Stuyvesant, and it woud increase Tourism.

Stuyvesant Station is 20 to 30 min closer than Hudson Station, to the many beautiful Bed & Breakfast & Inns in the towns of northern Columbia County; Kinderhook, Stuyvesant, Chatham, Ghent.

The Historic station is there, the tracks are there, now we only need Amtrak to stop at least 2 times a day in each direction. Morning and evening.

This would save commuting time, gas, energy, money. It would add ridership to Amtrak, thus better supporting environmentally friendly transportation.

Brief History Of The Stuyvesant Passenger Train Station

The Stuyvesant Station

"The station was probably built about 1900, according to Virginia Martin, a member of the restoration committee. The previous frame structure had burned in the fire of 1880, which destroyed many buildings in the community.
“Today the little station, which like Hudson’s and Chatham’s is on the National Historic Register, remains fairly intact with a ticket window and what is probably the original woodwork.”Ms.Martin stated.
“The restoration commit- tee has worked endlessly,” said Ms. Martin, “to raise funds to provide for the restoration of the north wall which had almost completely fallen away following a chim- ney collapse.”
“We definitely want it self- supporting” said Ms. Martin. “The town owns the structure after being awarded a  $211,000 federal grant in 1996 to cover part of the rehabilitation project,” she said.The committee has already replaced the slate roof and painted the restored roof canopy in a shade of blue that was original to the station.
One of the station’s most historic moments came in April 1865, when a train carry- ing the body of slain President Abraham Lincoln stopped at Stuyvesant to allow towns- people to pay their respects to their martyred President."

Columbia County Historical Society


It would take very little to restore limited passenger service to this station, serving Northern Columbia County residents, with service to New York and Albany. Especially now that there are so many who commute to Manhattan on a daily or weekly basis.

Please contact you Congressman and Senator to support restoring passenger service to historic Stuyvesant Station, by adding one stop to the Amtrak empire line.


"With Summer Vacations Nearing And Tourism Still Lagging, Senator Gillibrand Unveils New Effort To Promote Tourism In The Region"  
What better way to Promote tourism than to add train stops up the Hudson Valley

The Committee to Bring Amtrak Service to Stuyvesant Station